Category: Research

Considerable financial resources have been channeled into the quest for a cancer cure within the framework of the prevailing theory. For over a century, two foundational theories pertaining to cancer have coexisted, with one of these theories being actively suppressed. This suppression has led to devastating consequences, including the stifling of information, legal ramifications, and restricted scientific exploration. Curiously, numerous established cancer treatments are rooted in this second theory or related concepts, with documented instances where these treatments have successfully benefited thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of individuals.

To elucidate the distinction between the two theories of cancer in more accessible terms:

Reigning Cancer Theory

In accordance with the current theory, healthy cells undergo inexplicable transformations, giving rise to cancerous cells. Factors such as aging, dietary choices, genetics, or pre-existing medical conditions are believed to trigger these transformations. Despite the substantial investment of time and resources, progress in the treatment of cancer has been remarkably limited for over a century. While some scientists may debate this assertion, it remains an incontrovertible fact that, although chemotherapy has advanced since 1948, there is no substantive evidence supporting its capacity to enhance survival rates. This has led to a disconcerting situation where the same treatment methods have persisted for more than a century, with little substantive change, and an increasing percentage of cancer-related fatalities.

The Pleomorphism Cancer Theory

Conversely, the second theory, known as pleomorphism, faces significant prohibitions in its pursuit. One might naturally question whether the United States is a land of academic freedom and scientific exploration; however, this notion does not extend to researchers interested in investigating the pleomorphism theory of cancer. Funding for such research is elusive, and individuals attempting it are met with staunch resistance. Their colleagues often ostracize them, and government agencies, such as the FDA, FTC, and AMA, frequently impede their efforts. Remarkably, all successfully suppressed cancer treatments are rooted in this unconventional virus theory or akin concepts.

I strongly encourage you to refrain from taking my word at face value. Instead, undertake diligent internet research to unveil the hidden truth. Despite efforts to conceal it, evidence exists and is verifiable, awaiting discovery by the determined. We require more individuals well-versed in these facts, regardless of their technical background. I recommend a particular book as a starting point: “The Cancer Cure that Worked” by Barry Lynes and John Crane. This resource provides references and directs readers to official records available for examination.

Notable Developments in Cancer Treatment

B-flat Wain Water has garnered recognition from many for its purported effectiveness in cancer treatment. Colloidal silver, in its various forms, has been known for its ability to combat viruses and bacteria, a quality acknowledged for millennia. While we cannot definitively confirm its efficacy against cancerous cells, there have been documented instances of individuals with skin cancer, including melanoma, experiencing the drying and shedding of affected areas following its use. While it may not be a direct attack on cancer cells, it appears that the body’s healing processes are stimulated after the elimination of the virus. Certainty in this regard remains challenging to ascertain.

~ WR

The pharmaceutical industry is notorious for its relentless pursuit of financial gain, often disregarding ethical considerations. Its primary concern is safeguarding profits, with little regard for the potential harm or even loss of life. For over five decades, pharmaceutical companies have actively suppressed numerous breakthroughs in the realm of cancer, heart disease, and various other diseases. This suppression has been largely facilitated through the regulatory oversight of the FDA.

While this may initially appear incredulous, the veracity of these claims is unequivocal. These assertions are not up for debate; they are rooted in factual events. What follows is a factual account that can be corroborated by anyone, even a high school student.

The suppression of cancer and other disease cures has, over time, become more covert but remains substantiated. The FDA has relied on the public’s indifference and the seeming absurdity of its actions to perpetuate this charade.

FDA’s Involvement with Tryptophan

Another instance of FDA intervention involves the amino acid Tryptophan. This supplement, popularly available in health food stores throughout the United States, was widely utilized to improve sleep quality. Many found it effective, leading to numerous purchases as an alternative to prescription sleep aids. However, a tragic incident occurred in both the US and Japan, resulting in several deaths. Subsequent investigations revealed contamination in the Japanese-manufactured Tryptophan jars. Despite efforts to ensure purity at the manufacturing plant, Tryptophan was removed from shelves across the United States and never returned.

It is worth noting that American FDA agents had visited the Japanese Tryptophan plant prior to the distribution of impure jars. This raises questions about the inconsistency in FDA actions, given that hundreds of thousands of people die annually from prescription drugs, an issue that seems to be deemed acceptable.

The FDA’s Betrayal and Its Wider Impact

It is evident that the FDA’s actions have far-reaching consequences, affecting all Americans and resulting in suffering and loss of life. Additionally, the suppression of critical information regarding the treatment of various diseases impacts people globally. Regrettably, many individuals remain indifferent, believing that their efforts cannot bring about change. However, merely raising awareness among loved ones and acquaintances can shift this apathetic mindset and bring about transformation.

The DSHEA (The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act) of 1994 may create an illusion of safeguarding consumer interests. However, recent developments indicate otherwise. The FDA is actively pursuing a new law that would require their approval for all supplements sold in the United States. They have openly stated their intention to curtail half of the supplement industry through this law. Remarkably, while prescription drugs account for approximately 970,000 deaths annually and there have been zero reported deaths attributed to supplements in the entire health food industry, the FDA remains resolute in restricting access to these products unless they grant approval. This is not a matter they take lightly, as they have committed to enforcing this law with utmost rigor. Regrettably, Congress, despite being aware of the potential harm, has acquiesced to this agenda, purportedly due to influence from vested interests. This issue is currently under discussion in both the House and Senate, with prospects of becoming law in 2010, as all members of Congress have thus far shown support.

In the context of the FDA’s suppression of cures, I will provide a few significant examples below. Should you desire to verify the accuracy of this information, I am prepared to offer the necessary resources. Please keep in mind that these are but a few illustrations among numerous cases, as the constraints of time and space limit our ability to cover them comprehensively.

~ WR