Category: Research

Categories
Articles Research

Promising Results in Diabetes and Cancer via Vegetarian Diet

In a groundbreaking study conducted by Beyond Science Labs (a division of an independent religious-based university), researchers have made significant strides in the fight against two prevalent diseases: diabetes and cancer. Through our laboratory experiments and tests on dedicated volunteers, we have discovered a potential link between the consumption of certain chemicals found in meat, eggs, and dairy products, and the development and progression of these diseases.

While the data is still in its early stages and further research is required, the initial results indicate that adopting a primarily vegan diet can eliminate or significantly reduce diabetes and cancer symptoms in as little as two weeks.

Understanding the Chemicals in Animal Products

Meat, including beef, pork, poultry, and fish, along with eggs and dairy products, has long been a staple of many diets. However, our study suggests that these products may contain certain chemicals that could potentially contribute to the development of diabetes and cancer. While the exact mechanisms are still under investigation, it is believed that these chemicals may disrupt metabolic processes and promote inflammation within the body, thereby exacerbating the progression of these diseases.

The Vegetarian Diet Approach

In light of these preliminary findings, our study recommended that volunteers adopt a vegan diet as an experimental intervention. The vegan diet, which abstains from all animal-derived foods, including meat, eggs, and dairy, was chosen for its potential to exclude the identified chemicals implicated in disease progression. Additionally, volunteers were advised to avoid processed foods, as many of these products contain chemical additives that may further contribute to the development or worsening of their conditions.

Promising Results and the Need for Further Research

The results observed in our initial study were truly remarkable. Many volunteers who strictly adhered to the vegan diet experienced a notable improvement in their diabetes and cancer symptoms within a short period of just two weeks. Blood sugar levels stabilized, insulin sensitivity improved, and cancer markers decreased in many cases. These encouraging outcomes have led us to release this information before completing the full studies, in the hopes of generating interest among other research laboratories to conduct similar investigations.

However, it is important to stress that this information is still in the early stages, and further rigorous research is necessary to confirm these preliminary findings. We acknowledge that the vegan diet may not be a suitable option for everyone, and individual considerations such as existing health conditions and nutritional needs should be considered. Furthermore, it is essential to identify the specific chemicals within animal products that may be responsible for the observed effects and to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms involved.

How does what is in the food you eat affect diabetes and cancer?

While the idea that a vegan diet could potentially eliminate or radically reduce the impact of diabetes and cancer may seem counter-intuitive, our early findings provide a promising avenue for further exploration. By unveiling this information before the completion of the full studies, we hope to encourage other research laboratories to conduct similar investigations and contribute to the growing body of knowledge in this field. Ultimately, our goal is to improve the health and well-being of individuals by offering innovative dietary interventions that may positively impact their lives.

Categories
Research

The 1917 Cancer Cure

To embark on this historical journey, let’s commence with Dr. William Frederic Koch, who formulated a remedy named glyoxylide from herbal ingredients. Dr. Koch achieved a significant breakthrough when he successfully treated his first cancer patient in 1917. Subsequently, he extended his compassionate efforts to assist thousands of others, both directly and indirectly through fellow medical practitioners employing his treatment. It is pertinent to understand the prevailing cancer treatment methodology of that era, which may come as a revelation; it consisted of the same methodologies that had been in practice for over a century, predominantly reliant on x-ray and radium radiation. Remarkably, this approach continues to persist as a principal method in contemporary cancer treatment.

Now, consider this: a century has transpired, and the primary treatment modality for cancer remains largely unaltered. What’s more perplexing is that cancer-related mortality continues to rise. One might understandably question the logic behind this prolonged adherence to a therapeutic approach that, at best, has yielded limited success. Should we not expect those in authority to explore alternative avenues at some juncture? It becomes apparent that pharmaceutical companies predominantly allocate research funds to avenues they believe will not compromise their financial interests.

Dr. Koch articulated a distinctive approach, advocating that the objective should not be to annihilate cancer cells but to eliminate the underlying virus that causes their affliction, thus facilitating their return to normalcy.

Over the years, Dr. Koch faced relentless scrutiny and harassment from the FDA and FTC. In response, he sought refuge in Brazil, where he achieved remarkable successes in treating a broad spectrum of ailments, including advanced rheumatoid arthritis, insanity, diabetes, and even leprosy. This evoked growing concern from the FDA, prompting demands for his return to the United States. Upon his return, he endured unjust arrests on multiple occasions. Despite courtroom trials spanning from 1942 to 1946, during which the judge refused to admit testimonies from cured patients, Dr. Koch was acquitted by two separate juries. These protracted legal proceedings incurred a substantial cost to the government, exceeding $10 million at that time, which translates to approximately $100 million in today’s currency.

However, despite failing to conclusively prove that Dr. Koch’s technology cured cancer, his herbal remedy was no longer accessible within the United States. While he was not legally barred from selling his treatment to doctors, the FTC issued a cease and desist order, which effectively prevented medical practitioners from learning about his medicine and employing it to treat cancer patients.

Colonel Charles March, who assumed the leadership of the FTC and aimed to advocate for Dr. Koch, experienced an untimely and suspicious demise. During that period, and even to this day, it was not uncommon for those involved in alternative medical treatments to encounter similar fates.

It is estimated that over 100,000 patients benefited from successful cancer treatments between 1917, when Dr. Koch healed his inaugural cancer patient, and 1951, when the FTC mandated him to cease advertising to medical practitioners. Regrettably, his laboratories could not sustain operations without sales, and with his passing, along with the limited dissemination of his formula, the cure for cancer and various other illnesses was essentially lost.

The significance of Wain Water becomes evident today, as it emerges as an accessible medicine with affordability at its core. Once it gains wider public recognition and acceptance through rigorous testing, it holds the potential to be beyond the reach of the various regulatory bodies, including the FDA, FTC, and AMA, thus challenging the monopoly of pharmaceutical companies. At that juncture, the era of drugs that solely treat symptoms may draw to a close.

 

Categories
Research

The FDA and Heart Disease

An essential piece of information that the FDA has been hesitant to disseminate pertains to the misconception that high cholesterol levels in one’s bloodstream are the root cause of heart attacks. Despite assertions from organizations such as the AMA and various medical research groups, there exists no concrete evidence linking cholesterol levels to the risk of heart attacks. What they have demonstrated adeptly, however, is their capacity to generate substantial profits through the sale of cholesterol-lowering medications. Dr. Matthias Rath’s research findings shed light on an alternative perspective, asserting that vitamin deficiency, specifically a scarcity of vitamin C, lies at the heart of the matter when it comes to heart attacks. I urge you to delve into his works and consider this information with due diligence. Trust me; his research is substantiated by compelling evidence. The key to preventing heart attacks lies not in cholesterol-lowering drugs but in the realm of essential vitamins.

According to Dr. Matthias Rath, the human body comprises an intricate network of thousands of miles of blood vessels, most of which remain unaffected by clogging or health issues. If cholesterol were indeed the primary cause of blood vessel problems, it would impact the entire vascular system. However, it is only the approximately ten inches of veins closest to the heart that are susceptible to cholesterol-related issues. The reason behind this anomaly lies in the fact that these particular veins undergo constant flattening with each heartbeat, occurring at a staggering rate of 70 to 80 times per minute and millions of times annually. The issue is not one of blockages but rather the inability of these veins’ walls to endure such frequent compression, leading to structural damage.

Vitamin C emerges as a pivotal factor in maintaining the integrity of blood vessel walls. Inadequate intake of vitamin C can result in scurvy, a condition linked to heart attacks. The inner lining of these specific veins serves the crucial role of reinforcing them and preventing total collapse, rather than causing obstructions. When a vein experiences rupture, it remains compressed instead of returning to its original form, culminating in a heart attack. To safeguard against this, ensuring an adequate supply of vitamin C in our diets is paramount. Dr. Rath’s publications offer invaluable insights on this subject, and considering vitamin C supplementation is a prudent approach. It is pertinent to note that pharmaceutical companies may discourage exploring his work, as it could potentially deter individuals from purchasing their cholesterol medications.

A noteworthy fact is that Dr. Rath collaborated closely with Dr. Linus Pauling for several years. Dr. Linus Pauling, the only individual in history to be awarded two unshared Nobel prizes in medicine, concurred with Dr. Rath’s findings and contributed significantly to their validation and comprehension. The alliance between these two distinguished scientists lent substantial credibility to the research findings.

Presently, conventional medicine tends to address the symptoms while abstaining from the pursuit of the root cause. This approach persists partly because acknowledging the cause might entail curing the ailment, thus challenging the pharmaceutical industry’s ability to market medications. It is a somber truth; many aspects of our healthcare system are indeed profit-driven.

~ WR

Categories
Articles Research

FDA and Vitamins

It is imperative to acknowledge the compelling data I am about to present, despite the unfortunate tendency of the majority to overlook it. Moreover, it is of utmost concern that a significant portion of experts within the FDA have financial affiliations with pharmaceutical corporations. One might reasonably expect this to contravene the principles of public policy, yet it appears that they retain the right to engage in concurrent employment, even when it proves to be counterproductive. For those desiring further insight, I recommend reading “Deadly Medicine” by Thomas Moore, which delves into this issue in depth.

FDA and Its Stance on Vitamins

In the year 1992, the FDA embarked on a campaign aimed at restricting the over-the-counter purchase of vitamins, mandating a doctor’s prescription for such purchases. Despite the expenditure of considerable taxpayer funds, these endeavors not only failed to achieve their objectives but also had unintended consequences. A significant portion of the American populace perceived these actions as encroachments on their personal liberties, leading them to express their dissent by contacting their respective congressional representatives. In August of 1994, Congress made an attempt to solidify these restrictions into law. However, what unfolded was the unanimous passage of legislation by both houses of Congress and its subsequent presidential endorsement. This occurrence serves as a testament to the power of collective action when American citizens unite. All the pertinent events surrounding this issue are thoroughly documented within the public record.

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) was enacted to ensure unhindered public access to vitamins and other essential nutrients, alongside the provision of educational resources regarding these substances. This legislative intervention was deemed necessary due to the active efforts of pharmaceutical entities aimed at suppressing information regarding the health benefits of vitamins. In certain instances, these corporations even sought to prevent the publication of relevant literature on this subject, demonstrating the inadequacy of existing constitutional safeguards. We can now find reassurance in the presence of this legal framework, which protects our interests.

Nonetheless, it became apparent that the pharmaceutical industry’s efforts were far from quelled. These companies united to establish an international cartel and initiated a global movement to curb the dissemination of information pertaining to the health advantages of vitamins, minerals, and other natural substances. This movement was introduced under the pretext of consumer protection, as promoted by the United Nations Food Standards Commission. Their ultimate objective was to coerce industrialized nations, as well as the global community at large, into adopting a system where vitamins could solely be obtained through prescription medication. As part of this strategy, proposals for trade sanctions were presented against nations unwilling to comply with this United Nations General Assembly resolution.

In the year 1997, the central player in the pharmaceutical vitamin industry was the German government, renowned for its historical prominence in pharmaceutical exports. Nevertheless, their designs were thwarted by Dr. Matthias Rath, who delivered a groundbreaking address in Chemnitz on June 22nd of that year. Dr. Rath exposed the motives behind the cartel’s actions, directly linking them to pharmaceutical companies that had profited from World War II and the Holocaust. Thanks to this impactful discourse and numerous protest letters, this initiative became so controversial that it failed to secure presentation at the UN General Assembly.

Furthermore, on May 20, 1999, it was unveiled that multinational pharmaceutical corporations had colluded to form a “Vitamin Cartel” with the intent of controlling raw vitamin and material prices. This manipulation allowed them to deceive millions of people worldwide and amass over 100 billion dollars. Despite the magnitude of their misconduct, the punitive measures imposed amounted to a mere one billion dollars. To contextualize this, the U.S. Justice Department categorized this as the most extensive illegal cartel ever discovered, highlighting the inconsequential nature of their penalty relative to the enormous sums they wrongfully acquired from people globally.

~ WR

Categories
Research

Dangers of EMF in the Human Body

Dangers of EMF Exposure in the Human Body

As wireless technology becomes increasingly ingrained in the daily habits of people worldwide, questions of negative potential health effects have also been raised. While industrial manufacturers of wireless EMF producing products, and their allies in science, have repeatedly declared these products “safe,” serious questions remain in the scientific community as to what effects, both long term and short term, using EMP producing products such as cell phones, Wifi routers, smart meters, bluetooth devices, and even the electrical grid itself might have on the human population.

In this article I’ll cover some of what is known about the potential adverse health effects of wireless devices.

Are EMFs Potentially Harmful?

Among the scientific community, there is no broad consensus about the overall safety of wireless electronics. Currently, most commonly voiced opinion is the conservative position that, “more research is needed.”

However,  some scientists are raising the alarm. One article in the Journal of European Psychiatry claims that, “Low intensity microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce extensive brain damage and widespread neuropsychiatric effects.”

Fourteen effects that are considered proven side effects of even low level EMF exposure in the microwave and lower ranges – those typically produced by Wifi, cell phones, etc – are:

  • sleep disturbance/insomnia
  • headache
  • fatigue/tiredness
  • depression/depressive symptoms
  • dysesthesia
  • concentration/attention/cognitive dysfunction
  • dizziness/vertigo
  • memory changes
  • restlessness/tension/anxiety/stress/agitation/feeling of discomfort
  • irritability
  • loss of appetite/body weight
  • skin tingling/burning/inflammation/dermographism
  • nausea
  • EEG changes

The paper also proposes another 20 effects that may be linked to EFM exposure, but are not yet conclusively linked.

But, if so many effects are linked to EMF exposure in common household appliances, how can this be legal?

Why Current EMF Safety Guidelines Are Inadequate to Protect Users

Current safety guidelines for EMF exposure are only based on the expected temperature increases produced microwaves or radio waves are measured to produce in the human body. In essence, they are attempting to ensure you won’t microwave your brain. But these guidelines are not enough.

There are two reasons current EMF safety guidelines are inadequate.

  1. Safety guidelines underestimate average body size and levels of use, especially in cell phones
  2. Safety guidelines fail to consider secondary biological effects including activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs)

Most developed countries regulate EMF exposure of cell phones based on models that anticipate 30 minutes of usage by full grown adult males. And completely fail to account for smaller individuals, including children, who may be using wireless appliances for hours at a time.

Effects of Cell Phone EMF on Sperm Count

One of the most certain effects of cell phone use is decreased sperm count and sperm vitality in males.

Carrying an active cell phone in your pants pocket has been tested in many countries, and is virtually certain to cause reduced sperm count in all cases. Further tests have been conducted by giving males who don’t usually carry a cell phone, an active device to hold for a short amount of time, which also decreased sperm count markedly.

One study of male sperm potential linked the amount of time one uses a cell phone directly with lower quality sperm.

Why is sperm count so well tested? Sperm is easy to collect, and cheap to find willing participants. But, the results are thought to reflect on similar, yet hard to collect, body tissues such as female eggs, and neurological tissues in the brain and spinal cord.  While sperm count only directly affects men, lower sperm counts are an indicator of serious dangers for anyone in close proximity of a cell phone.

Adverse Health Effects of 5G Cell Phone Technology

One new worry on the horizon is the potentially increased harmful effects of next generation cell phone technologies including 5G.

Studies of existing cell phone technologies have already found measurable biological changes due to exposure to cell phone radiation. They say that:

In vitro studies reveal that EMF even below maximum permissible levels may induce changes in the blood-brain permeability barrier and disorders in active transport of Na+, K+ ions and release of Ca++ ions by cellular membranes.

While they also list a number of reported ill effects including:

  • headache
  • fatigue
  • general ill-being
  • muscular pains
  • nausea

This particular report concludes that more research is needed to fully establish the effects of cell phones on the human body.

Further research has found that cell phones measurably affect cognitive ability related to slow brain potential.

While, most research on 5G seems to indicate that it is no more dangerous than existing phone technologies, one research team has serious questions about established testing methods.

These researchers identify two areas where existing research fails, which may mask the true dangers of 5G EMFs:

  1. Effects of burst transmission and data content found in real world 5G usage
  2.  Synergistic negative effects of existing EMFs, as well as chemical and biological toxins

Together, these failings mask what the researchers consider to be “adverse systemic effects,” beyond the skin and eye irritation already widely reported by other researchers.

Effects of Low Frequency EMF from Power Lines

While not often considered as a potential form of EMF, grid power lines currently account for the majority of electromagnetic radiation on the planet, in terms of power transmitted. Studies have found low frequency EMF transmission, in the 50Hz to 60Hz range, to have significant negative health effects including:

These effects all happen at relatively low levels of consistent exposure. The type of exposure typically found in homes. Especially if you sleep or work near in use power chords.

While exposure to low level grid produced EMFs are certainly is certainly not a new phenomena, it is possible that effects of such exposure may be underestimated. Although certainly not the only cause, increased rates of cancer and obesity in the general population over the last 100 years may be linked in part to the proliferation of grid power throughout developed countries.

Additionally, compound affects of both low frequency and microwave frequency EMFs produced by cell phones, computers, and other wireless devices may have an even more profound negative health affect. Unfortunately, such combined effects are rarely if ever investigated by health researchers.

Wifi EMF Effects on the Human Brain and Sleep Patterns

Wifi devices, and especially Wifi routers or base stations, transmit a consider amount of microwave radiation, including potentially harmful burst operations and frequency variations due to data content.

Studies in the European Union have identified the presences of a Wifi router in the bedroom to be a significant cause of difficulty sleeping, or poor sleep patterns. This sleep study ruled out the placebo and sleep effects due to blinking lights by testing some people with unplugged routers, and some people with fake routers with only blinking lights, but no radio transmitter or receiver.

Since Wifi operates in the 2.4Ghz ISM band, it is likely that other transmitters that operate in the microwave ranges including bluetooth, wireless phones, baby monitors, and cell phones may have similar negative effects on sleep.

Harmful Effects of Smart Meter Related EMF

While the effects of smart meter related EMF are not fully understood, the addition of another high intensity microwave transmitter in near proximity to the home is likely to exacerbate already established harmful symptoms of household EMF exposure, including:

  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Nausea
  • Fatigue
  • Muscle Pains
  • Irritability
  • Memory Loss
Categories
Research

Pharmaceuticals vs Herbal Remedies

The third-largest cause of death in the USA is medicine and medical practitioners, in the shadow of heart disease and cancer, and if the truth were known, the medical and pharmaceutical sciences and the practitioners thereof would be revealed as the number one cause of death.

Not all pharmaceuticals are good for you. In fact, many are killing unwitting Americans while medical doctors and staff collude with and assist the industry to extract as much capital as possible from your estate (or subsidized medical resources) before your pulse finally stops.

Many legally prescribed medications have a dark side and are far more dangerous than the pharmaceutical companies would like you to know. Some of these could include benzodiazepines (Klonopin, Valium, Xanax). Then there are the anticoagulants (Heparin, Warfarin, Xarelto).

Other potentially dangerous prescription medications include antidepressants (Cymbalta, Prozac, Wellbutrin, Zoloft), and patented anti-hypertensives (Cardura, Hytrin, Minipress). Clozapine is an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia, not to forget Semi-Synthetic Opioids (OxyContin, Percocet, Vicodin) which are generally used to treat moderate to severe pain.

Thanks to lawsuits against the pharmaceutical companies, we now know that they are so committed to profiting greatly off an insignificant public that they will falsify and create medical studies and pay doctors to put their name(s) on the studies to get them published, in many cases with the full knowledge that their new drug(s) have potentially deadly side effects.

A many as 10 percent of all published reports regarding new drugs are written by the drug manufacturers who pay doctor(s) to use their names on the reports, when the doctors named had little or nothing to do with the study.

More than 60% of all academic studies are financed by the drug manufacturers, who have been known to alter the data prior to submitting the results.

The most prominent example of the insatiable greed of Big Pharma is Merck’s Vioxx debacle, where they were likely responsible for the deaths of 500,000 Americans over the age of 65, but gladly paid 4.85 billion dollars for killing 3,468 seniors, after enjoying a 5-year run of selling the aspirin replacement that caused heart attacks and strokes.

Having to pay a negotiable percentage of the revenue from the lethal painkiller seems like a small price to pay, an acceptable cost of doing business in the pharmaceutical industry where you take the good with the bad and still come out on top.

Other “legal” drugs that suffered a fate similar to Vioxx include Risperdal, Seroquel, Zyprexa, and Hormone Replacement Therapy, among others, which makes you wonder about the other medications that we see promoted on TV and in the media with the laundry list of side effects that may include death in some people (a possible side effect of manufacturing patented prescription medications).

If that’s not enough, there are other prescription medications, like the statin family available under the names of atorvastatin (Lipitor), fluvastatin (Lescol XL), lovastatin (Altoprev), pitavastatin (Livalo), pravastatin (Pravachol), rosuvastatin (Crestor, Ezallor) and simvastatin (Zocor, FloLipid), which tout efficacy in the lowering of cholesterol and preventing heart attacks, but the side effects can cause crippling muscle pain, type 2 diabetes, memory loss, confusion, or rhabdomyolysis leading to liver damage, kidney failure and death. Stop taking the statins, and the side effects fade away.

Before the advent of all this medical profiteering, we tended to our needs using natural substances from Mother Earth. These primitive methods of healing were all placed here with us, to help alleviate pain and heal us, her inhabitants, from every ailment.

They are so effective that Big Pharma models their patented medications after them, like aspirin. Aspirin was fashioned after a pain-relieving compound found in the bark of a willow tree.

Granted, natural remedies have also seen their share of darkness as “snake oil salesmen” used to promise the miraculous healing capabilities of herbal substances for money.

Nonetheless, there are some herbal remedies which have eared their right to compete with the most high-tech patented pharmaceuticals. One such herb is the most prescribed medication in Germany, Ginkgo Biloba for its supremacy in improving memory and other cognitive functions, in the USA, Ginkgo is not as well respected among the medical community. In Germany, medical students are obligated to study herbal alternatives, if even only rudimentarily (not so in the United States).

A few other herbal remedies have been proven to be as effective or even better than their patented prescription imitators, and they have survived and been proven in clinical trials to be the real deal. Besides Ginkgo, the top “proven” herbal supplements are:

  1. Black Cohosh – Helps with the effects of menopause
  2. Chestnut – (horse chestnut) Improves poor blood circulation in legs (varicose veins)
  3. Devil’s Claw – Anti-inflammatory and helps with joint pain
  4. Garlic – Reduces cholesterol and lowers blood pressure
  5. Hawthorne – Helps some heart conditions
  6. Saw Palmetto – Helps with men’s enlarged prostate, better urination
  7. St. John’s Wort – For mild or moderate depression

And there are many other noteworthy natural herbal remedies worth their weight in complementary alternative medicine (CAM) with fewer side-effects than pharmaceuticals, but without the clout of clinical trials to back them up.

The ongoing battle between Big Pharma and Mother Nature continues. And no one here is failing to admire the medical community for all the good they do in the world, but this dark side of pharmaceutical companies is causing the faith of patients to waver.

The smart thing to do is to practice due diligence in all medical interventions and take responsibility for your own care. You decide what is best for you.

Do not be the next casualty of being an uninformed patient.

Consider having two doctors, a medical doctor, and a holistic professional, consulting with both before committing to any prescribed medication, do some research on your own, then make your own educated decision.

Your life may depend on it.

–David M Masters

Categories
Research

Stop Eating 4 Things to Purify Your Body and Soul

In the lab, we determined four foods, that if you eliminated them from your diet, would result in having the most significant impact on your body and soul. Keep in mind this research is ongoing and incomplete, based on data we’ve accumulated thus far. We share this data for others to continue to do the work in tandem to verify that you can stop eating 4 things to purify your body and soul.

Based on what we’ve learned so far, the four items are Canola Oil, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Wheat, and Aspartame.

CANOLA OIL

There’s no such thing as a Canola plant. It’s a Monsanto hybrid. Canola oil is made from seeds of the rapeseed weed. “Canola Oil” is a brand-melding Canada (it’s country of origin) and oil.

The Rapeseed hybrid weed harbors toxic compounds called erucic acid and glucosinolates. Erucic acid has already been determined to cause heart problems when studied from the mustard seed source.

“Canola” is grown utilizing RoundUp which makes it high in glyphosate, which causes leaky gut and irritable bowel syndrome. Processing turns it into a high-risk trans-fat. Processing also includes a lengthy toxic hexane solvent wash, then they bleach it in an attempt to remove the hexane from the product.

Causes hair thinning and loss, and may also be used as a weed killer, ant, fly, mouse, and pest killer, and is known to kill birds in areas where it is used as a pesticide.

It doesn’t break down in the body because it’s not natural.

The 6 Dangers of Canola Oil

  1. Kidney and Liver Problems
  2. Life-threatening Heart Problems
  3. Hypertension and Strokes
  4. Retards Normal Growth in Cells and Small Children
  5. Increases the Uptake of Unhealthy Trans-fats
  6. Many other GMO-related health problems, and side effects

Canola Oil also causes or acerbates Type II Diabetes, leads to dementia, insanity, death.

Was created in World War I but used more so in WWII for lubricating guns, hardware, and machinery. After WWII, they no longer had a use of it, so to protect their investment, they decided to tell the world how great this new oil was for your body.

The FDA approved it as GRAS (Generally Regarded As Safe). The company paid the FDA $150 million (under the table) plus $50M (over the table) to get the certification.

When fed to cows (86 – 91) in Europe was considered to be the cause of Mad Cow Disease. They originally attributed the MCD to serving up bad sheep parts, but when they removed Canola Oil from the cow’s diets, the mad cow disease disappeared.

Check labels. If it has canola oil in it, don’t put it in your body.

HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP (HFCS)

Ingesting concentrated High Fructose Corn Syrup causes

  • Leaky gut
  • Type II Diabetes
  • Promotes Cancer
  • High levels of Mercury
  • Massive weight gain
  • Fatty Liver and Liver Stress
  • Hepatitis

Top 20 Foods with High Fructose Corn Syrup

  1. Soda
  2. Candy
  3. Sweetened Yogurt
  4. Salad Dressing
  5. Frozen Junk Foods
  6. Breads
  7. Canned Fruit
  8. Juice
  9. Boxed Dinners
  10. Granola Bars
  11. Breakfast Cereals
  12. Store-bought Baked Goods
  13. Sauces and Condiments
  14. Snack Foods
  15. Cereal Bars
  16. Nutrition Bars
  17. Coffee Creamer
  18. Energy Drinks and Sports Drinks
  19. Jam and Jellies
  20. Ice Cream

MODERN WHEAT

Not officially GMO but crossbred and modified (by mutagenesis) nonetheless. The new wheat has proteins the human body has never seen before.

Modern wheat is responsible for causing those who partake of it regularly to suffer from

  1. Heart Disease
  2. Diabetes
  3. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
  4. Cognitive disorders
  5. Arthritis
  6. Osteoporosis
  7. Cataracts
  8. Obesity

Most Common Complaints Due to Wheat

  • Headaches
  • Indigestion
  • Asthma
  • Stomach Cramps
  • Stuffy or Runny Nose
  • Hives or Skin Rash
  • Diarrhea
  • Sneezing
  • Vomiting

Notable, but less common, modern wheat eaters may find themselves suffering from Anaphylaxis, a condition that impairs breathing and can send the victim into shock.

As an aside, modern wheat gives you the munchies, like marijuana. Therefore, it is used as an additive to all kinds of foods and liquor because it causes cravings for whatever is being consumed.

ASPARTAME

Was initially created and used as a mind-control drug by the Nazis and later as a part of MK Ultra. When mixed with methanol (wood alcohol) becomes extremely sweet.

It was promoted as an artificial sweetener, though it still performs the same function as the mind control drug; it makes your mind pliable and easily suggestible while you are eating these foods in front of the television, while surfing the Internet, exposed to media, and/or propaganda.

Side effects of Aspartame

  1. Migraines and Cluster Headaches
  2. Diabetic Complications
  3. Vision Problems (glaucoma)
  4. Hearing Issues
  5. Extreme Sensitivity to Sound
  6. Chronic Inflammation
  7. Arthritic Symptoms
  8. Skeletal Pain
  9. Weight Loss Prevention
  10. Risk of Seizure
  11. Abdominal Pain and Cramping
  12. Irritable Bowel Syndrome/Leaky Gut
  13. Cancer Antagonist (colon and intestinal)
  14. Slurred Speech
  15. Restless Leg Syndrome
  16. Severe Depression
  17. Suicidal Tendencies
  18. Anxiety
  19. Aggression
  20. Personality Changes
  21. Paranoia
  22. Phobias
  23. Insomnia
  24. Heart Palpitations
  25. Increased Allergies
  26. Hives
  27. Asthma
  28. Severe PMS
  29. Unquenchable Thirst
  30. Hair Loss
  31. Craving for Sweets
  32. Hyperactivity in Children

The effects of Aspartame mimic the following diseases:

  1. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
  2. Epstein-Barr
  3. Post-polio Syndrome
  4. Lyme Disease
  5. Grave’s Disease
  6. Meniere’s Disease
  7. Alzheimer’s Disease
  8. ALS
  9. Epilepsy
  10. Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
  11. Hypothyroidism
  12. Mercury sensitivity from Amalgam fillings
  13. Fibromyalgia
  14. Lupus
  15. Non-Hodgkins
  16. Lymphoma
  17. Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)
  18. Parkinson’s

Aspartame blocks or lowers the levels of

  1. Serotonin
  2. Tyrosine
  3. Dopamine
  4. Norepinephrine
  5. Adrenaline

It is our intention to make these findings available to you to further do research and contribute to the growing knowledgebase concerning how to stop eating 4 things to purify your body and soul.

Here, at the lab, we see no downside to altering our diets to exclude these four things.

–David M Masters

Categories
Research

Magnesium Potassium Heart Attack

So, there we are, my granddaughter and my friend having dinner at the Mexican restaurant, and Bam! My friend falls to the floor and he tells me to call 911. He’s had two heart attacks prior to this, and this makes the third.

The ambulance comes to take him to the hospital and my granddaughter and I am not too far behind. I’ve never had a heart attack, so it was quite educational to be supportive and, in a sense, “be there” for my friend as he was going through this adventure.
Then, after preliminary tests were made, (now brace yourself for this one), the doctor comes in and says,

“It’s no surprise you had a heart attack. You had no magnesium or potassium in your system.”

I was shocked to hear this statement, and I said, “Whoa, whoa, whoa, what do you mean? What do magnesium and potassium have to do with my friend’s heart attack?”

The doctor said that magnesium and potassium are necessary key ingredients that enable your heart to fire and operate correctly.

My friend asked about his other two heart attacks (which they had full records of at this same hospital)? The doctor confirmed that he had very low levels of both magnesium and potassium at the time of his previous heart attacks as well, and this one, was more severe and life-threatening than the other ones.

The doctor left to take care of some other patients, and my friend and I started to talk about this recent revelation about levels of magnesium and potassium. He told me that while he had been seen and treated twice prior to this, no one ever said two words (specifically these two words) to him about his being low on magnesium and/or potassium… and he could have died.

I think of myself as fairly health conscious and I do my fair share of supplementation, but guess what two ingredients are not in my supplemental regimen? Magnesium and potassium were absent. Well, not totally absent because there were some of each in my multivitamin.

Until this moment in time, I had no idea how important it was to have these two ingredients in your system. How embarrassing would it be for someone as healthy as me to show up in the hospital with a heart attack because I didn’t know about the importance of these two ingredients?

On the way home from the hospital, I stopped and picked up some magnesium and potassium to add to my daily regimen. My friend is also taking magnesium and potassium supplements. Who wouldn’t?

What a travesty to let my friend be treated for two heart attacks and never be made aware of the importance of magnesium and potassium? It’s as if he may not have had any of these heart attacks if he had higher levels of magnesium and potassium in his body.

To me, this seems like an important disclosure. I don’t know why none of the other doctors mentioned the lack of magnesium and potassium to my friend before, but for whatever reason, here it is.

If it’s a highly guarded secret, the cat’s out of the bag, now.

So, now you know, too.

Pass it on.

Author: David M Masters

Source: http://davidmmasters.com/blog/magnesium-potassium-heart-attack/

Categories
Research

Exercising Prudent Scrutiny in Regard to the FDA

It is imperative that we diligently verify the information at hand. These facts are accessible for confirmation, and it is unwise to solely rely on my word. I strongly encourage you to investigate independently.

It is crucial to acknowledge that there are no inherently incurable diseases. Alongside products like Wain Water, cures for all ailments exist. Regrettably, these remedies are concealed and have remained largely unused. The realm of alternative medicine has been hindered from harnessing many of these innovations due to persistent misinformation and unfounded allegations, resulting in the burning of valuable books and the destruction of essential equipment. In the absence of effective treatments, it remains perplexing why knowledge resources are suppressed in such a manner.

The FDA is implicated in the suppression of all potential cancer cures, as well as essential information concerning heart attack prevention through vitamins, and other products or data that could potentially diminish the profits of major pharmaceutical companies. Instead of unwavering trust in my claims, I implore you to embark on your educational journey. The internet is a valuable repository of information on this subject. Simply initiate a web search for “FDA Suppression” using any search engine, and you will gain access to an array of documents spanning as far back as the 1930s.

It is indeed disheartening that authorities have, on numerous occasions, chosen to imprison whistleblowers and exert pressure to coerce retractions of their statements. Tragically, many courageous individuals have endured significant personal losses and ultimately abandoned their struggles against such suppression. Countless lives hang in the balance, contingent upon the medical community’s willingness to desist from obscuring vital information.

It is important to note that I opted to publish this information outside of the United States, driven by the apprehension of potential retribution from the FDA. You may question why I did not avail myself of the constitutional protection of freedom of speech. Regrettably, it appears the FDA does not honor such protections. A troubling history of arresting authors and scientists who dare to challenge their practices exists, with charges often being fabricated to silence dissenting voices. Judges involved in such cases frequently maintain affiliations with the FDA and employ tactics such as the offer to drop charges in exchange for the renunciation of one’s work or an admission of its inefficacy. This has led to the demoralization and exhaustion of those ensnared in the legal quagmire, with some inventors and authors passing away without witnessing justice served.

In actuality, the situation is even more dire. Asset seizures, encompassing property, businesses, vehicles, and bank accounts, frequently occur without proper authorization. The consequences of these actions are nothing short of devastating, wreaking havoc on individuals’ lives. During trials, biased judges create formidable barriers to presenting a valid defense, resulting in the incarceration of even the most commendable individuals dedicated to the betterment of human health. These actions are a grave offense against humanity, as they obliterate livelihoods and stifle the potential for cures. Surprisingly, these actions transpire without meaningful opposition.

One may wonder why these actions persist. The answer is straightforward: the potential for pharmaceutical companies to amass billions of dollars hangs in the balance should cures become readily available to the global population. This may pose job security concerns for industry employees, given that a cancer cure could reduce the demand for radiation therapy and chemotherapy drugs, potentially leading to hospital closures. However, these developments also promise the salvation of countless lives and the alleviation of untold suffering. The pivotal question remains: Is it preferable to prioritize job security or to mitigate suffering by providing essential training for alternative employment opportunities?

Consider exploring Wain Water or colloidal silver in any form. When appropriately administered in conjunction with other established natural remedies and nutrition, silver has demonstrated effectiveness in treating numerous diseases. I must exercise caution in my choice of words, as I have no desire to face prosecution, sudden disappearance, or untimely demise.

~WR

 

Categories
Research

The 1930 Rife Cancer Cure

Let us delve into the remarkable contributions of Dr. Royal R. Rife, a luminary hailing from San Diego, California. Dr. Rife embarked on his pioneering research journey in 1920, slightly later than Dr. Koch. At the heart of his groundbreaking work was the invention of a microscope that diverged significantly from the state-of-the-art microscopes of his time.

While his initial microscopes possessed limited magnification capabilities, his most advanced model boasted an astonishing magnification power of 30,000. This achievement was profoundly groundbreaking, particularly given the well-established scientific understanding that non-electronic microscopes could not exceed a magnification of 2,500. According to prevailing optical theory, light waves could not be amplified beyond this threshold.

Electronic microscopes, though available, presented a unique challenge in the context of studying small viruses, as the light frequencies they employed were detrimental to these microscopic entities. Dr. Rife, however, developed his distinct theory of light microscopes, whose capabilities exceeded those of traditional counterparts. Notably, the microscopes constructed by Dr. Rife were of such exceptional quality that they remain in existence to this day. Each successive iteration of Rife’s microscopes exhibited enhanced magnification and visualization capabilities, ultimately enabling the detection of cancer viruses.

Dr. Rife’s microscopes harnessed a range of light sources with diverse frequencies. Utilizing the heterodyne principle, his microscopes facilitated the transformation of one frequency into another, a technique that had been in use within radio frequencies for some time and continues to be so. Dr. Rife ingeniously applied this principle to the realm of light frequencies. Despite enduring the destruction of his microscopes and the burning of his books and plans, numerous doctors relied on Rife’s microscopes for the identification and confirmation of cancer.

Having unveiled the cancer virus, Dr. Rife proceeded to develop a device capable of its effective elimination. His approach was both elegantly simple and grounded in scientific principles, centering on the concept of radio antennas. Essentially, each frequency corresponded to a specific length of metal that could be stimulated by an electrical current. This configuration allowed for the tuning of specific frequencies and the initiation of an electrical flow through a wire of the appropriate length. The effect of this current was lethal to the virus when it passed through it.

The University of Southern California administered a dedicated Research Committee to oversee Dr. Rife’s laboratory work until the late 1930s. Additionally, the head of the U.S.C. Medical Committee conducted follow-up clinics in 1935, 1936, and 1937 to validate Dr. Rife’s results. Independent physicians likewise employed machines identical to Rife’s, successfully treating up to 40 patients per day. Many practitioners continued this therapeutic approach for over two decades, yet the mounting pressure they faced became untenable. Upon the discovery of an operational machine, authorities either destroyed it or confiscated it as evidence.

Dr. Rife’s groundbreaking research into precise frequencies for various illnesses received widespread recognition and was published in various reputable sources, including scientific journals, medical publications, and the annual report of the Smithsonian Institution. Throughout the 1930s, thousands of patients experienced successful treatments until authorities intervened.

In a subsequent collaboration with engineer John Crane, their collective work was relocated to Crane’s laboratory. Tragically, during a government raid, all of their equipment and research were obliterated, and their books were reduced to ashes. Crane was apprehended. This event marked the commencement of sustained challenges and conflicts with authorities. In the absence of support from the University, Dr. Rife was compelled to terminate his groundbreaking work.

Today, Rife frequency generators are employed by numerous individuals worldwide. While not all of these generators accurately replicate Dr. Rife’s work, some have proven effective in treating cancer and other diseases. Dr. Rife’s pioneering microscopes continue to be used by a select few or have been faithfully reproduced.

The Concealment of Truth

How did these innovative treatments, poised to benefit humanity, become obscured from public awareness? Two primary factors emerge as central to this tragic narrative: greed and vested interests. There were scientists, well-known in their fields, whose theories and associations with pharmaceutical companies motivated them to protect the status quo, all driven by financial considerations.

Pharmaceuticals and Their Influence on Congress:

The influence of pharmaceutical companies within the corridors of Congress is undeniable. While hundreds of vital industries wield substantial lobbying power, the magnitude of financial resources deployed by pharmaceutical companies to shape legislation is nothing short of staggering. It is an unsettling reality that requires scrutiny.

Intriguingly, verifying the accuracy of these claims is well within reach. A wealth of documents and sources are available on the internet, offering insights into the individuals and issues discussed here. By conducting a simple online search, you can access a trove of information on FDA suppression, among other topics, which will direct you to original source materials.

The Ongoing FDA Denial

Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting these claims, the FDA consistently rebuffs these assertions and commands ample resources to bolster their counterarguments. Legal proceedings often center on technicalities rather than the core issues at hand, making it challenging to expose the shortcomings of prevailing medical technologies. It is indeed a source of frustration that the information presented here can be easily corroborated with modest research efforts, yet legal obfuscation often impedes its introduction in a court of law.

~ WR