Considerable financial resources have been channeled into the quest for a cancer cure within the framework of the prevailing theory. For over a century, two foundational theories pertaining to cancer have coexisted, with one of these theories being actively suppressed. This suppression has led to devastating consequences, including the stifling of information, legal ramifications, and restricted scientific exploration. Curiously, numerous established cancer treatments are rooted in this second theory or related concepts, with documented instances where these treatments have successfully benefited thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of individuals.
To elucidate the distinction between the two theories of cancer in more accessible terms:
Reigning Cancer Theory
In accordance with the current theory, healthy cells undergo inexplicable transformations, giving rise to cancerous cells. Factors such as aging, dietary choices, genetics, or pre-existing medical conditions are believed to trigger these transformations. Despite the substantial investment of time and resources, progress in the treatment of cancer has been remarkably limited for over a century. While some scientists may debate this assertion, it remains an incontrovertible fact that, although chemotherapy has advanced since 1948, there is no substantive evidence supporting its capacity to enhance survival rates. This has led to a disconcerting situation where the same treatment methods have persisted for more than a century, with little substantive change, and an increasing percentage of cancer-related fatalities.
The Pleomorphism Cancer Theory
Conversely, the second theory, known as pleomorphism, faces significant prohibitions in its pursuit. One might naturally question whether the United States is a land of academic freedom and scientific exploration; however, this notion does not extend to researchers interested in investigating the pleomorphism theory of cancer. Funding for such research is elusive, and individuals attempting it are met with staunch resistance. Their colleagues often ostracize them, and government agencies, such as the FDA, FTC, and AMA, frequently impede their efforts. Remarkably, all successfully suppressed cancer treatments are rooted in this unconventional virus theory or akin concepts.
I strongly encourage you to refrain from taking my word at face value. Instead, undertake diligent internet research to unveil the hidden truth. Despite efforts to conceal it, evidence exists and is verifiable, awaiting discovery by the determined. We require more individuals well-versed in these facts, regardless of their technical background. I recommend a particular book as a starting point: “The Cancer Cure that Worked” by Barry Lynes and John Crane. This resource provides references and directs readers to official records available for examination.
Notable Developments in Cancer Treatment
B-flat Wain Water has garnered recognition from many for its purported effectiveness in cancer treatment. Colloidal silver, in its various forms, has been known for its ability to combat viruses and bacteria, a quality acknowledged for millennia. While we cannot definitively confirm its efficacy against cancerous cells, there have been documented instances of individuals with skin cancer, including melanoma, experiencing the drying and shedding of affected areas following its use. While it may not be a direct attack on cancer cells, it appears that the body’s healing processes are stimulated after the elimination of the virus. Certainty in this regard remains challenging to ascertain.
~ WR